An Analysis of the Returns from an Investment in Water Entitlements in Australia

Author/s: Henning Bjornlund, Peter Rossini

Date Published: 1/01/2007

Published in: Volume 13 - 2007 Issue 3 (pages 344 - 360)

Abstract

Using thirteen years of market data from the Goulburn-Murray Irrigation District in Victoria, Australia, cash-flow analyses are used to assess returns that investors could have achieved through an investment in water entitlements under different cash-flow management scenarios. Cycle factor analyses were conducted to determine the extent to which entitlement prices follow allocation prices. Returns from investments in water entitlements seem to be higher but more risky than investments in the share market. The movement in prices of water entitlements and allocations are reasonably synchronized, while price fluctuations of allocation prices are about twice that of water entitlements

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2007.11104237.pdf 14445921.2007.11104237.pdf (280kB)

Keywords

Discounted Cash Flow - Time Series Analysis - Water Entitlements - Water Investment - Water Trading - Water Value

References

  • ACIL Tasman (2003): Water Trading in Australia – Current and Prospective Products. ACIL Tasman, Canberra.
  • Bjornlund, H. (2004): Water markets and the environment – what the irrigation community told us. Proceedings from the Riversymposium. Brisbane 31 August to 3 September. http://www.riversymposium.com/index.php?page=GeneralArchive
  • Bjornlund, H. (2002): Signs of Maturity in Australian Water Markets. New Zealand Property Journal, July, 31–46.
  • Bjornlund, H. (1999): Water Trade Policies as a Component of Environmentally, Socially and Economically Sustainable Water Use in Rural Southeastern Australia. PhD thesis, Adelaide: University of South Australia.
  • Proceedings from the 12 Annual Conference of the Pacific Rim Real Estate Society
  • Proceedings from the 11 Annual Conference of the Pacific Rim Real Estate Society
  • Bjornlund, H. Rossini, P. (2004): Factors Influencing Prices Paid in the Market for Temporary Water. Pacific Rim Property Research Journa,l 10(4), 400-419.
  • Brown, L.; McDonald, B.; Tysseling, J. and Dumars, C. (1982): Water Reallocation, Market Proficiency, and conflicting social values. In Weatherford, G.D.; Brown, L.; Ingram, H. and Mann, D. Eds. Water and Agriculture in the West U.S. - Conservation, Reallocation, and Markets. Studies in Water Policy and management, No. 2. Boulder: Westview Press, 191-256.
  • Colby, S.B. (1987): Do Water Markets “Work”? Market Transfers and Trade-offs in the Southwestern States. Water Resources Research, 23(7), 1113–1122.
  • Kerr, S. (2004): Evaluating the New Zealand Individual Transferable Quota Market for Fisheries Management. In OECD Tradeable Permits - Policy Evaluation, design and Reform. Paris: OECD, 121-134.
  • Newell, R.G.; Sanchirico, J.N. and Kerr, S. (2002): Fishing Quota Markets. Discussion Paper 02-20. Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future.
  • Person, P. and Michelsen, A. (1994): Determinants and Trends in Water Right Prices: An Econometric Analysis. Wyoming Water Resources Center, Laramie, Wyoming.
  • Pulido-Velazquez, M., Jenkins, M.W.; and Lund, J.R. (2004): Economic Values for Conjunctive Use and Water Banking in Southern California. Water Resources Research, 40, W03401.
  • Zekri, S. and Easter, W. (2005): Estimating the Potential Gains from Water Markets: a Case Study from Tunisia. Agricultural Water Management, 72, 161-175.