Value of Collective Effort: Redevelopment Timing Options of Enbloc Sale Sites in Singapore

Author/s: Tien Foo Sing, Chen Wan Jenny Lim

Date Published: 1/01/2004

Published in: Volume 10 - 2004 Issue 2 (pages 193 - 214)

Abstract

This paper applies the discrete-time binomial tree option-pricing framework proposed by Cox, Ross and Rubinstein (1979) to evaluate redevelopment options embedded in collective sale sites in Singapore. Based on 30 collective sale transactions recorded in 1999, our empirical results showed that the average redevelopment option premium was estimated at S$12.24 million or 9.65% of the gross development value. By adding the redevelopment-timing premium to the developer’s profit and returns of 15%, the developer would expect a premium of 24.65% of gross development value if he were to exercise his option to redevelop now. Otherwise, it will be more valuable to keep the redevelopment option “alive.” The regression results further showed that the option premiums are positively and significantly related to the size and the price of the collective sale sites. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted and the results showed that the redevelopment option premiums increase when the price volatility, which is measured by the spread between the upward (u) and downward (d) price movements, increases. Changes in risk-free interest rates have positive effects on the option premiums.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2004.11104160.pdf 14445921.2004.11104160.pdf (249kB)

Keywords

Binomial Tree Option Pricing Model - Collective Sale - Redevelopment Option

References

  • Hadhi, A. (1994a) The millionaires of Changi Heights. The Business Times, 2 November 1994.
  • Hadhi, A. (1994b) $75m profit awaits five Walshe Rd property owners. The Business Times, 15 December 1994.
  • Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-659.
  • Capozza, D. R. and Sick, G. (1991) Valuing long-term leases: the option to redevelop. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4(2), 209-223.
  • Childs, P. D., Riddiough T. J. and Triantis, A. J. (1996) Mixed uses and the redevelopment option. Real Estate Economics, 24(3), 317-339.
  • Cox, J. C., Ross, S. A. and Rubinstein, M. (1979) Option pricing: a simplified approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(3), 229-263.
  • Kalpana, R. (2002) City Dev rents out Kim Lin Mansioni. The Business Times, 11 March 2002.
  • Kerk, C. (1998) En-bloc sales not seen making comeback for some time. The Business Times, 23 December 1998.
  • Kerk, C. (1999a) En bloc sales set for a comeback, say consultants. The Business Times, 17 May 1999.
  • Kerk, C. (1999b) Money can’t buy a place called home. The Straits Times, 15 October 1999.
  • Low, S. P. (1999) Success factors for managing En Bloc property transactions. Property Management, 17(1), 37-48.
  • Lum, S. K., Sim, L. L and Lee, L. C. M. (1999) Bargaining chip in En Bloc gains. The Business Times, 23 September 1999.
  • Majd, S. and Pindyck, R. (1987) Time to build, option value, and investment decisions. Journal of Financial Economics, 18(1), 7-27.
  • Merton, R. C. (1973) Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4(1), 141-183.
  • Quigg, L. (1993) Empirical testing of real option-pricing models. Journal of Finance, 48(2), 621-640.
  • Sing, T. F. 2001. Optimal timing of development under uncertainty. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 19(1), 35-52.
  • Sing, T. F. and Patel, K. (2001a) Empirical evaluation of the value of waiting to invest. Journal of Property Investment & Finance. 19(5), 535-553.
  • Sing, T. F. and Patel, K. (2001b) Evidence of irreversibility in the UK property market. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 41(3), 313-334.
  • Tan, H. Y. (1999a). En-bloc sales on the way back. The Straits Times, 21 1999.
  • Tan, S. Y. (1999b) Those who’re not moved by the windfall. The Business Times, 15 October 1999.
  • Tan, H. Y. and Pang, G. C. (1997) Amendment to en bloc sales law - analysts feel developers may not bite and owners may still not sell. The Straits Times, 21 November 1997.
  • Titman, S. (1985) Urban land prices under uncertainty. American Economic, 75(3), 505-514.
  • Williams, J. T. (1991) Real estate development as an option. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4, 191-208.
  • Williams, J. T. (1997) Redevelopment of real assets. Real Estate Economics, 25(3), 387-407.
  • Yamazaki, R. (2001) Empirical testing of real option pricing models using land price index in Japan. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 19(1), 53-72.